Anarchism for a better tomorrow

this post is tagged as food.
click here to view it.

this post is tagged as nsfw.
click here to view it.

this post is tagged as multiple-words.
click here to view it.

Posted on Thursday, 17 September 2015

tabbitcha:
“rossjm:
“navybluewings:
“ rtrixie:
“ huffingtonpost:
“ notthatmirandajuly:
“ huffingtonpost:
“ If you needed any more proof that late-night TV is still a man’s world, look no further than Vanity Fair. Ten men in suits (8 of whom are...

rossjm:
navybluewings:
rtrixie:
huffingtonpost:
notthatmirandajuly:
huffingtonpost:
If you needed any more proof that late-night TV is still a man’s world, look no further than Vanity Fair. Ten men in suits (8 of whom are white) sit sipping whiskey for a recent story, under the headline “Why Late-Night Television Is Better Than Ever.” The answer certainly is not diversity of any kind.
Vanity Fair features no women, lots of whiskey.
Hey, we like whiskey too. And, you know, being good at jokes
👏👏👏👏
Of course the answer isn’t diversity, because diversity neither makes things better nor does it have any inherent value.
Good job for unintentionally pointing that out, huffpo.
20% is also more than representative of the racial minorities, so what are they even complaining about?
They’re complaining about the lack of women, even though, as rtrixie pointed out, diversity has no intrinsic value. The gender or race of the person sat at the desk is irrelevant to the actual quality of the show.
Did huffington post really just respond to someone with a bunch of clapping emojis
Christ, how old is their PR person? 15?